Wednesday, September 11, 2013
12 Years After September 11, Haunting Memories Of Terror Attack
12 years after attack, haunting memories of Sept. 11
shaping US debate on Syria
By JOSH LEDERMAN
Associated Press
Updated: September 11, 2013 - 3:10 am

The Tribute in Light rises above lower Manhattan,
during a test, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2013 in New York.
The light display commemorates the twin towers of
the World Trade Center that were destroyed in
terrorist attacks 12 years ago on Sept. 11, 2001. One
World Trade Center is in the center background. (AP
Photo/Mark Lennihan)
WASHINGTON — Twelve years later, haunting
memories of Sept. 11 are shaping the debate over
what to do about Syria.
As Americans mark the anniversary of the 2001
terrorist attacks, the nation again is wrestling with
painful questions about al-Qaida, weapons of mass
destruction and the risks of American inaction. At the
center of the debate is President Barack Obama, who
has sought to move the U.S. away from what he has
called the "perpetual wartime footing" it found itself
on in the years after 9/11.
"America is not the world's policeman," Obama said
Tuesday evening as he addressed the nation about
the Syria conflict. "Terrible things happen across the
globe, and it is beyond our means to right every
wrong. But when, with modest effort and risk, we can
stop children from being gassed to death and
thereby make our own children safer over the long
run, I believe we should act."
Some people worry that a U.S. strike in Syria would
embroil the American military in an extended and
unwinnable conflict in the Middle East, evoking
emotions many felt in the years after 9/11 as they
watched America's sons and daughters go back for
second and third tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Others see Syria through a broader Mideast prism
involving Iran. They fear that if the U.S. doesn't
assert itself now, America will start from a position of
weakness if and when it confronts future threats in
the region.
When Obama and the first lady stand on the South
Lawn of the White House on Wednesday morning to
commemorate 9/11 victims with a moment of
silence, there's a good chance at least some of these
themes will be weighing on the president.
AL-QAIDA AS TOP THREAT
The international terrorist organization headed by
Osama bin Laden became synonymous with
"America's enemy" in the days after 9/11. More than
a decade later, bin Laden is dead and Obama says
the group's core is on the path to defeat. But blows
to al-Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan have come
amid growing concerns about al-Qaida's strength in
the Arabian Peninsula, North Africa and even Syria.
That foreign jihadi fighters, many linked to al-Qaida,
are growing in ranks among rebels fighting Assad's
regime is a major concern for lawmakers and the U.S.
Assad and his forces have sought to exploit that
concern, arguing, in short, that "the enemy of my
enemy is my friend."
Assad said of a potential U.S. strike in an interview
Sunday with American journalist Charlie Rose, "This
is the war that is going to support al-Qaida and the
same people that kill Americans in the 11th of
September."
STATE OF ALERT
Although Americans are far less jittery about the
threat of terrorism than they were in the aftermath of
9/11, they're still keenly aware of turmoil in the
Middle East and its challenges for the U.S.
Nearly all Americans — 94 percent — say the war on
terrorism has not yet been won, according to a new
Associated Press poll. Just 14 percent of those
Americans say it's likely the U.S. will win it during the
next 10 years.
Such sentiments were punctuated Tuesday when
Obama, hours before his national address on Syria,
signed a notice extending the national emergency for
another year.
"The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on
Sept. 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues,"
Obama wrote to Congress.
Compounding concerns have been new threats to
America's embassies and consulates. A threat from
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula led to the closing of
19 diplomatic posts across the Mideast and in Africa
last month. And as Obama considered a strike in
Syria last week, the State Department was ordering
nonessential American diplomats to leave the U.S.
Embassy in neighboring Lebanon because of the
potential for retaliation from Iran-backed Hezbollah, a
group allied with Assad.
IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN
With the U.S. military struggling to absorb deep
automatic spending cuts, few Americans are eager
for the U.S. to get involved in a civil war already
raging for more than two years, with no end in sight.
Obama, who ran for president as a critic of the Iraq
war, ended it as president and is winding down the
U.S. war in Afghanistan, is of similar mind.
"I know how tired the American people are of war
generally, and particularly war in the Middle East.
And so I don't take these decisions lightly," Obama
said in an NBC interview Monday.
Obama and his aides know many Americans
reflexively resist anything that calls to mind the
aggressive stance President George W. Bush took
after 9/11. They're insisting any U.S. action will be
limited and won't involve troops on the ground.
"This is not Iraq or Afghanistan," Obama's chief of
staff, Denis McDonough, said repeatedly Sunday on
political talk shows.
But Republicans are hearing a slightly different
message. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va.,
arranged for Republican congressional staffers to
hear from Stephen Hadley, Bush's former national
security adviser, and Eric Edelman, once a top aide to
Vice President D. Cheney. Both played major roles in
the Iraq war and are now selling leery Republicans on
a strike in Syria.
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION
"The lesson of September the 11th is take threats
before they fully materialize," Bush said in August
2006.
Those days, it was erroneous intelligence claiming
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction
that incensed many Americans as civilian deaths hit
record highs three years into the war in Iraq.
Today, there are few doubts chemical weapons have
been used in Syria. Assad's regime even
acknowledged publicly this week that it possesses
the weapons when it agreed to give them up as part
of a budding diplomatic deal to avert a U.S. strike.
Obama acknowledges that Syria poses no direct or
imminent threat to the U.S. But his pitch to
Congress, the public and U.S. allies is rooted in the
belief that if the world doesn't act now to uphold a
global norm against chemical weapons use, we all
could be at risk down the line.
"Sometimes wars have started later because people
didn't do things that might have prevented them
earlier," Secretary of State John Kerry said Tuesday.
www.therepublic.com/view/story/
df66f5e6f0c7436cb904513a3eb72ca2/US-Sept-11-
Syria
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment